Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChud Pantoja, Vivian Lorena
dc.contributor.authorPeña-Montoya, Claudia Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorOsorio Gómez, Juan Carlos
dc.description.abstractThe importance of solid waste management is a relevant issue in supply chain management because of the accelerated increase in waste generation, pollution and the need to properly manage waste in companies in a particular way and throughout the whole supply chain in a general way. We present a model that supports decision-making regarding solid waste management (particularly glass packaging), for a manufacturer, considering the perspective of the closed-loop supply chain. The model uses the AHP methodology to define the multiple criteria to be considered in the decision and for the selection of the best alternative available according to those criteria. This model was applied at a glass packaging manufacturer in Colombia. The result of the implementation of the model delivered the waste management strategy (used packaging) that best meets the objectives of the echelon under considerationeng
dc.format.extent27 páginasspa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021eng
dc.subjectCadena de suministrospa
dc.titleDecision support model for solid waste management in a closed-loop supply chaineng
dc.typeCapítulo - Parte de Librospa
dcterms.audienceComunidad generalspa
dc.subject.lembResiduos sólidosspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Autónoma de Occidentespa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Educativo Digitalspa
dc.relation.citesChud-Pantoja, V.L., Peña-Montoya, C.C., Osorio-Gómez, J.C. (2021). Decision Support Model for Solid Waste Management in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain. In: García-Alcaraz, J.L., Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Z-Flores, E. (eds) Trends in Industrial Engineering Applications to Manufacturing Process. Springer, Cham.
dc.relation.ispartofbookTrends in industrial engineering applications to manufacturing processeng
dc.relation.referencesAchillas C, Moussiopoulos N, Karagiannidis A et al (2013) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tacklewastemanagement problems: a literature review.Waste ManagRes 31:115–129.
dc.relation.referencesAgarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2006) Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach. Eur JOper Res 173:211–225. 12.005
dc.relation.referencesAhmadi S, Amin SH (2019) An integrated chance-constrained stochastic model for a mobile phone closed-loop supply chain network with supplier selection. J Clean Prod 226:988–1003. https://
dc.relation.referencesAkdo˘gan M¸ S, Co¸skun A (2012) Drivers of reverse logistics activities: an empirical investigation. Proc Soc Behav Sci 58:1640–1649.
dc.relation.referencesAlidi AS (1996) A multiobjective optimization model for the waste management of the petrochemical industry. Appl Math Model 20:925–933 06-0
dc.relation.referencesAmin SH, Zhang G (2012a) An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: multi-objective approach. Expert Syst Appl 39:6782–6791. 1016/j.eswa.2011.12.056
dc.relation.referencesAmin SH, Zhang G (2012b) A proposed mathematical model for closed-loop network configuration based on product life cycle. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:791–801. 170-011-3407-2
dc.relation.referencesAmin SH, Zhang G (2013) A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return. Appl Math Model 37:4165–4176. 10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.039
dc.relation.referencesAragonés-Beltrán P, Pastor-Ferrando JP, García-García F, Pascual-Agulló A (2010) An analytic network process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). J Environ Manag 91:1071–1086. 12.007
dc.relation.referencesAya˘g Z,Özdemir RG (2009)Ahybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Comput Ind Eng 56:368–379.
dc.relation.referencesBarker TJ, Zabinsky ZB (2011) A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega 39:558–573.
dc.relation.referencesBollinger D, Pictet J (2008) Multiple criteria decision analysis of treatment and land-filling technologies for waste incineration residues. Omega 36:418–428. 2006.07.008
dc.relation.referencesBottero M, Comino E, Riggio V (2011) Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environ Model Softw 26:1211–1224.
dc.relation.referencesBowen WM (1995) A Thurstonian comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and probabilistic multidimensional scaling through application to the nuclear waste site selection decision. Socioecon Plann Sci 29:151–163.
dc.relation.referencesBrentAC, Rogers DEC, Ramabitsa-Siimane TSM, RohwerMB(2007) Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health carewaste management systems thatminimise infection risks in developing countries. Eur J Oper Res 181:403–424.
dc.relation.referencesBüyüközkan G, Berkol Ç (2011) Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Syst Appl 38:13731–13748.
dc.relation.referencesBüyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39:3000–3011. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
dc.relation.referencesChangN-B, ParvathinathanG,Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decisionmaking for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87:139–153
dc.relation.referencesCharnpratheep K, Zhou Q, GarnerB(1997) Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy geographical information systems. Waste Manag Res 15:197–215. 0076
dc.relation.referencesChen H-W, Chang N-B, Chen J-C, Tsai S-J (2010) Environmental performance evaluation of largescalemunicipal solidwaste incinerators using data envelopment analysis.WasteManag 30:1371– 1381.
dc.relation.referencesChiou CY, Chen HC, Yu CT, Yeh CY (2012) Consideration factors of reverse logistics implementation— a case study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. Proc Soc Behav Sci 40:375–381https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.203
dc.relation.referencesChud VL (2015) Modelo multicriterio soporte a la tomma de decisiones para la gestión de residuos sólidos en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Universidad del Valle
dc.relation.referencesChud VL, Osorio JC, Peña CC (2018) Modelo multicriterio como soporte la gestión de residuos de vidrio en una cadena de suministro de ciclo cerrado. Rev Espac 39:20–35
dc.relation.referencesCoban A, Ertis IF, Cavdaroglu NA (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167. https://
dc.relation.referencesContreras F, Hanaki K, Aramaki T, Connors S (2008) Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:979–991.
dc.relation.referencesCorum A (2020) Remanufacturing, an added value product recovery strategy: In: Waste management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, pp 1432–1452
dc.relation.referencesCram S, Sommer I, Morales L-M, et al (2006) Suitability of the vegetation types in Mexico’s Tamaulipas state for the siting of hazardous waste treatment plants. J Environ Manag 80:13–24.
dc.relation.referencesCruz JM (2009) The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Decis Support Syst 48:224–236
dc.relation.referencesda Silva L,Marques Prietto PD, Pavan Korf E (2019) Sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management in large and medium-sized worldwide cities. J Clean Prod 237:117802. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117802
dc.relation.referencesDas S, Lee SH, Kumar P et al (2019) Solid waste management: scope and the challenge of sustainability. J Clean Prod 228:658–678.
dc.relation.referencesDe Brito M, Dekker R (2004) A framework for reverse logistics. Reverse Logist 3–27
dc.relation.referencesDe FeoG,DeGisi S (2010) Using an innovative criteriaweighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP. Waste Manag 30:2370–2382. j.wasman.2010.04.010
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Nacional de Planeación (2016a) Informe nacional de aprovechamiento
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Nacional de Planeación D (2016b) Documento CONPES Social 3874. Política Nacional Para La Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos. Bogotá D.C
dc.relation.referencesDhouib D, Elloumi S (2011) A new multi-criteria approach dealing with dependent and heterogeneous criteria for end-of-life product strategy. Appl Math Comput 218:1668–1681. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.046
dc.relation.referencesDivahar SR, Sudhahar C (2012) Selection of reverse logistics provider using AHP. Proc Eng 38:2005–2008.
dc.relation.referencesEfendigil T,Önüt S,Kongar E (2008)Aholistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness. Comput Ind Eng 54:269–287. cie.2007.07.009
dc.relation.referencesEkmekçio˘gluM,Kaya T,Kahraman C (2010) Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 30:1729–1736. 02.031
dc.relation.referencesErol I, Sencer S, Sari R (2011) A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecol Econ 70:1088–1100. 2011.01.001
dc.relation.referencesFleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R et al (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17
dc.relation.referencesGarcía JO, Bermeo JA (2017) Logística emprearial. Primer, Machala-Ecuador Garfì M, Tondelli S, Bonoli A (2009) Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps. Waste Manag 29:2729–2739. 05.019
dc.relation.referencesGemitzi A, Tsihrintzis VA, Voudrias E et al (2007) Combining geographic information system, multicriteria evaluation techniques and fuzzy logic in sitingMSWlandfills. EnvironGeol 51:797– 811.
dc.relation.referencesGomes CFS, Nunes KRA, Xavier LH et al (2008) Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil. Omega 36:395–404
dc.relation.referencesGovindan K, Mina H, Esmaeili A, Gholami-Zanjani SM (2020) An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under ncertainty. J Clean Prod 242:118317.
dc.relation.referencesHanandeh A, El-Zein A (2009) Strategies for the municipal waste management system to take advantage of carbon trading under competing policies: the role of energy from waste in Sydney. Waste Manag 29:2188–2194.
dc.relation.referencesHatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Moradi M, Kangi F (2013) A fuzzy group electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Saf Sci 51:414–426. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.015
dc.relation.referencesHekkert MP, Joosten LA., Worrell E, Turkenburg WC (2000a) Reduction of CO2 emissions by improved management of material and product use: the case of primary packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 29:33–64.
dc.relation.referencesHekkertMP, JoostenLAJ,WorrellE(2000b) Reduction ofCO2 emissions by improvedmanagement of material and product use: The case of transport packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 30:1– 27.
dc.relation.referencesHerva M, Roca E (2013) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis. Ecol Indic 25:77–84. 09.005
dc.relation.referencesHo W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202:16–24. 05.009
dc.relation.referencesHung ML,MaHW,YangWF(2007)Anovel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag 27:209–219.
dc.relation.referencesIakovou E, Moussiopoulos N, Xanthopoulos A et al (2009) A methodological framework for endof- life management of electronic products. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:329–339
dc.relation.referencesJayant A, Gupta O, Garg S, Khan M (2014) TOPSIS-AHP based approach for selection of reverse logistics service provider: a case study of mobile phone industry. Proc Eng 97:2147–2156
dc.relation.referencesKainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101:99–108.
dc.relation.referencesKhan S, Faisal MN (2008) An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag 28:1500–1508.
dc.relation.referencesKo YD, Noh I, Hwang H (2012) Cost benefits from standardization of the packaging glass bottles. Comput Ind Eng 62:693–702.
dc.relation.referencesLiamsanguanC,Gheewala SH(2008) LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems. J Environ Manage 87:132–138. 2007.01.003
dc.relation.referencesLiao C-H, Chiu ASF (2011) Evaluate municipal solid waste management problems using hierarchical framework. Proc Soc Behav Sci 25:353–362. 10.554
dc.relation.referencesLin R-J (2013) Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J Clean Prod 40:32–39.
dc.relation.referencesLiu A, Xiao Y, Lu H, et al (2019) A fuzzy three-stage multi-attribute decision-making approach based on customer needs for sustainable supplier selection. J Clean Prod 239:118043. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118043
dc.relation.referencesLourenço J, Barbosa M, Cirne L (2016) A logística reversa aplicada a gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos no Município de Campina Grande-PB. Espacios 37:13
dc.relation.referencesLu LYYY, Wu CHH, Kuo T-CC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45:4317–4331. https://doi. org/10.1080/00207540701472694
dc.relation.referencesMAVDT (2007) Gestión Integral de residuos o desechos peligrosos. Bases Conceptuales, República de Colombia MAVDT (2010) Politica Nacional de Producción y Consumo Sostenible
dc.relation.referencesMonroy N, Ahumada M (2006) Logística reversa: Retos para la Ingeniería Industrial. Rev Ing 23. Doi: 10.16924%2Friua.v0i23.349
dc.relation.referencesNagurney A, Toyasaki F (2003) Supply chain supernetworks and environmental criteria. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 8:185–213.
dc.relation.referencesNas B, Cay T, Iscan F, Berktay A (2010) Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environ Monit Assess 160:491
dc.relation.referencesNasiri F, Huang G (2008) A fuzzy decision aid model for environmental performance assessment in waste recycling. Environ Model Softw 23:677–689. 04.009
dc.relation.referencesOlugu EU, Wong KY (2012) An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Syst Appl 39:375–384. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.026
dc.relation.referencesPGIRS (2019) Plan de Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos de Santiago de Cali, Colombia. https:// dos_pgirs/
dc.relation.referencesPochampally K, Gupta S, Govindan K (2009a) Metrics for performance measurement of a reverse/closed-loop supply chain. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 1:8–32.https://doi. org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2009.026263
dc.relation.referencesPochampally K, Nukala S, Gupta S (2009b) Strategic planning models for reverse and closed loop supply chains. Londres
dc.relation.referencesQuintero P, Galvis A, Marmolejo LF, Collazos H (2007) Modelo conceptual de la selección de tecnologías para el manejo integral de residuos sólidos en localidades colombianas con menos de 50000 habitantes. In: Conferencia Latinoamericana de Saneamiento, Seminario Gestión de Residuos Sólidos. Cali
dc.relation.referencesRavi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2005) Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 48:327–356. 10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.017
dc.relation.referencesRealff MJ, Ammons JC, Newton D (2000) Strategic design of reverse production systems. Comput Chem Eng 24:991–996.
dc.relation.referencesRoussat N, Dujet C, Méhu J (2009) Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.Waste Manag 29:12–20. 2008.04.010
dc.relation.referencesRubio S, Miranda FJ, Chamorro A, Valero V (2007) A reverse logistics system at grupo industrial alfonso gallardo. Universia Bus Rev 88–99
dc.relation.referencesSaaty TL, Gholamnezhad H (1982) High-level nuclear waste management: analysis of options. Environ Plan B Plan Des 9:181–196
dc.relation.referencesSalminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma R (1998) Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. Eur J Oper Res 104:485–496
dc.relation.referencesSenthil S, Srirangacharyulu B, Ramesh A (2012) A decision making methodology for the selection of reverse logistics operating channels. Prorc Eng 38:418–428. 2012.06.052
dc.relation.referencesShiue Y-C, Lin C-Y (2012) Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry. Energy Build 54:266–277. j.enbuild.2012.07.032
dc.relation.referencesSiddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122:515–523
dc.relation.referencesTaji K, Levy JK, Hartmann J et al (2005) Identifying potential repositories for radioactive waste: multiple criteria decision analysis and critical infrastructure systems. Int J Crit Infrastructures 1:404–422
dc.relation.referencesTavares G, Zsigraiová, Semiao V (2011) Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 31:1960–1972. 04.013
dc.relation.referencesThierryM, Salomon M,VanNunen J,VanWassenhove L (1995) Strategic issues in product recovery managemen . Calif Manag Rev 37:114–136
dc.relation.referencesTsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, et al (2020a) A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach. J Clean Prod 251:119740.
dc.relation.referencesTsai FM, Bui TD, Tseng ML, Wu KJ (2020b) A causal municipal solid waste management model for sustainable cities in Vietnam under uncertainty: a comparison. Resour Conserv Recycl 154:104599.
dc.relation.referencesTseng M-L, Chiu ASF (2013) Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. J Clean Prod 40:22–31
dc.relation.referencesTseng M-L, Lin YH (2009) Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ Monit Assess 158:519
dc.relation.referencesTseng M-L, Tan K-H, Lina R-J, Gengb Y (2012) WITHDRAWN: multicriteria analysis of green supply chain management using interval-valued fuzzy TODIM
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nations Development Program (2015) United nations program for the sustainable development goals.
dc.relation.referencesVego G, Kuˇcar-Dragiˇcevi´c S,KoprivanacN(2008) Application ofmulti-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia. Waste Manag 28:2192–2201.
dc.relation.referencesWang D, Tang YT, Long G et al (2020) Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive drivenmunicipal solid wastemanagement for a city in England.WasteManag 102:452– 463.
dc.relation.referencesXi BD, Su J,HuangGHet al (2010) An integrated optimization approach andmulti-criteria decision analysis for supporting the waste-management system of the City of Beijing, China. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:620–631.
dc.relation.referencesYeh C-H, Xu Y (2013) Sustainable planning of e-waste recycling activities using fuzzy multicriteria decision making. J Clean Prod 52:194–204.
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.subject.proposalClosed-loop supply chaineng
dc.subject.proposalDecision supporteng
dc.subject.proposalSolid waste managementeng

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Derechos reservados - Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021